Hoklo on Bali, reports from the field

Discussions on the Hokkien (Minnan) language.
Locked
niuc
Posts: 734
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 3:23 pm
Location: Singapore

Re: Hoklo on Bali, reports from the field

Post by niuc »

amhoanna wrote:
Right! They went to TW b/c they couldn't afford the fare to Manila. :mrgreen:
Oh yeah, I read somewhere that 番 there referred particularly to the Philippines.
I guess by the time of this saying, though, people no longer thought of "ke Tai'oan" as a flavor of "ke hoan".
Hmmm, true. I suppose that at the time Hokkiens still thought of Tai'oan as a "foreign" place?

This means having a lot of lawsuits on your back? Something that happens to politicians?
Not directly. Liam5-thi1-thi1 means very sticky. So, it's a very sticky business to get involved with the gahmen officials. When I first heard that saying as a child, it invoked a picture of gahmen officials' robes being very sticky (as an allegory), so better stay away from them. I prefer to think that this is in line with Laozi's philosophy! :mrgreen:

Always interesting to hear what PRC people say in private!
Yup! This reminds me of my conversation with some Mainland Chinese. I told them that although my father went to pro-KMT school, he became a fervent (though passive) supporter of PRC/CCP, as he thought of KMT as corrupt and a puppet of US. They were surprised to hear that, as they didn't like PRC gahmen (CCP). We concluded that quite a number of overseas Chinese were well disposed toward CCP because they didn't know about its ba5/7-u2 (from Malay "bau" -> stink; 臭空) and they didn't live under its rule.
"The ROT" could've been a done deal with no side effects back in the '80s or earlier, but the ROC got in the way.
So PRC wouldn't attack ROT at that time? Please tell me more.
I hear this all the time, but still don't really get it. What's 刣頭生理 exactly?
Literally "business of chopping head", i.e. for money/benefits, some people are willing to be assassins or to harm others.
amhoanna wrote:Just wanted to add: someday we're all just gonna be ASEAN + 9, or ASEAN + whatever! :lol:
Hopefully in a peaceful manner! :mrgreen:
SimL
Posts: 1407
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 8:33 am
Location: Amsterdam

Re: Hoklo on Bali, reports from the field

Post by SimL »

amhoanna wrote:Re Singapore... What U said, Sim, reminds me of a paper entitled "Formosa: More Like Luzon than Hainan" or something like that. It's online for all to read. There's a very strong case that TW (and its Han settlers) is historically LIKE any other Han-settled place in Nusantara. But Qing bureaucracy and a lack of distance from China made TW an exception!
Hi amhoanna,

Thanks for the tip. The article itself is this, if anyone else is interested. I certainly found it interesting.

http://www.international.ucla.edu/cira/paper/Wills.pdf
SimL
Posts: 1407
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 8:33 am
Location: Amsterdam

Re: Hoklo on Bali, reports from the field

Post by SimL »

amhoanna: your name is perfect!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8406506.stm

This shows that we were all originally Malays anyway :mrgreen:.

Apparently, prior to this study, there were two major (and competing) theories about the origin of the Malays: 1) That they came from Yunnan. 2) That they came from Taiwan. This latest study (which, after all, is based on strict biological criteria), implies that it's the other way around.

Good support for the people who like to think that "All Men Are Brothers" (which is not such a bad philosophy, actually).

I stumbled across this from the Wikipedia article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malay_race which says:

"With new scientific evidence presented by HUGO (Human Genome Organization) through genetic studies of the Asian races, the facts points to a single Asian migration from the South East Asian regions (which is predominantly populated by malay races) travelling northwards and slowly populating East Asia (China, Korea and Japan) instead of the other way around as it is usually popularly depicted"
amhoanna
Posts: 912
Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2010 12:43 pm

Re: Hoklo on Bali, reports from the field

Post by amhoanna »

Thanks, guys.

Sim, I read that there's a suku (ethnic group) somewhere in the islands between Bali and Papua that refers to all outsiders as "Malay" in their own language, no matter if they're black or white. :lol: I may've said this here already...

Re the PRC not attacking a new Taiwanese nation if it would've come up earlier... I could be wrong, but once upon a time China's economy was in a shambles and they wouldn't've had the firepower to invade TW. Also the Cold War was in effect and the U.S. was fond of its "friends" on the Asian Pacific Rim. Probably less of a factor after Nixon's visit, etc.
niuc
Posts: 734
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 3:23 pm
Location: Singapore

Re: Hoklo on Bali, reports from the field

Post by niuc »

Thanks, Sim & Amhoanna, for all the info. :mrgreen:
Great to read these!
SimL wrote: Apparently, prior to this study, there were two major (and competing) theories about the origin of the Malays: 1) That they came from Yunnan. 2) That they came from Taiwan. This latest study (which, after all, is based on strict biological criteria), implies that it's the other way around.
It depends on how the term Malay is defined. Not sure how standard is the usage of the term "Malay race" to refer to Austronesian or even including Thai, Khmer (how about Burmese or Vietnamese or Hmong) etc, for me it sounds strange to refer to Alisan-lang in Taiwan or Maori as Malay race, not to mention non-Austronesians.

The BBC news article itself doesn't mention specially which part of South East Asia. Although I am a layman about this, if I am allowed to have a personal opinion (due to my interest in the topic), I think that it should be mainland SEAsia. However, there was a time when western Nusantara still connected to mainland SEAsia, right? If the migration occured during that time, then may be no need to differentiate between mainland and (western) maritime SEAsia. In a stricter sense, I don't think the population of then mainland SEAsia could be referred to as Malay race, though no doubt Malay race is among its descendants. And in this sense, it is possible for the earlier theories (particularly if it's part of the old tradition of the people) to be reconciled with the new findings, i.e. may be Malay race was formed in a later time in Yunnan or Taiwan or mainland SEAsia, and then migrated to Malay Peninsula and Nusantara. Then later there were intermarriages with Indian and Arab, so I expect that Melayu's genes are different from (though similar to) the population referred to in the article; actually all its descendants (including Chinese) have different genes (though similar) due to intermarriages and mutation, right?

In connection to this great finding, it'd be great if we can know what the experts say about the development of genetic differences among (East) Asians, including physical features e.g. eye shape, skin colour etc.
Ah-bin
Posts: 830
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 8:10 am
Location: Somewhere in the Hokloverse

Re: Hoklo on Bali, reports from the field

Post by Ah-bin »

Now if I might add my opinion to the debate on Taiwanese being Chinese or otherwise. I think it is good to treat people's beliefs about their ethnicity with as much respect as we do their religious beliefs, even if we happen to think they are nonsense. Individuals have their reasons for believing themselves to be something rather than the other, and it is only when they start organising to exterminate people who disagree or who believe they belong to some other group, that I think we should come out and criticise their choices.

I remember in China I met some people who said they were Nong people not Zhuang as the CCP claimed they were, and when I told someone else, she said "No, they are not Nong, they are Zhuang!" Who did I believe? The people who told me themselves that they were Nong. Why believe what someone else says about people when you can get it from the horse's mouth?

About the Vietnamese worshipping the little guy, it seems they have been worshipping the Han general Ma Yuan for years without even knowing it! For those who are not aware, Ma Yuan was the one who led an army to defeat the Trung sister's in 41AD, and wiped out the native leadership structures in the red River Plain. This is similar to the worship of Tan Oan-kong 陳元光, I think.

http://csds.anu.edu.au/volume_4_2010/18 ... 0_Shiu.pdf

Unfortunately this is all in Chinese.
amhoanna
Posts: 912
Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2010 12:43 pm

Re: Hoklo on Bali, reports from the field

Post by amhoanna »

In Manila or Sugbo (Cebu) I saw a jeepney with this tagline: "PRIDE OF THE MALAY RACE".

It's interesting that no matter which definition of "Malay" we use, Luzon's agta and the orang asli of the "Malay Peninsula" fall beyond it.

Re the TWese/Chinese debate, I think the debate has mostly taken place "in-group", i.e. w/i TWese circles. All sides of the debate are bound together in their identity, although that could change in the future. It's not easy to escape the choices made by other people in the group. This is why people tried/try so hard to sell each other on a certain pt of view.

Treating "ethnicity beliefs" like religious beliefs and respecting them is probably the best strategy for getting along with people, no doubt.
About the Vietnamese worshipping the little guy, it seems they have been worshipping the Han general Ma Yuan for years without even knowing it! For those who are not aware, Ma Yuan was the one who led an army to defeat the Trung sister's in 41AD, and wiped out the native leadership structures in the red River Plain. This is similar to the worship of Tan Oan-kong 陳元光, I think.
Thanks, Ah-bin. I didn't know about this. Looks like the VNese are even more Han and less hoanna than I thought!! OK, no more cheap shots from me. In this thread. :mrgreen:
Ah-bin
Posts: 830
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 8:10 am
Location: Somewhere in the Hokloverse

Re: Hoklo on Bali, reports from the field

Post by Ah-bin »

I'm not surpirse you didn'nt know about it! It's only been published in the last week! In fact, this years online journal of Chinese Southern Diaspora Studies is devoted to Vietnam. These other articles may also be of interest.

http://csds.anu.edu.au/volume_4_2010/contents.php

John Phan's piece is really interesting, as he presents linguistic evidence that the people living in the Red River Delta in the T'ang were actually speaking some sort of Sinitic language. They then shifted back to using an Austroasiatic language that was creolised in the same way as Penang Baba Hokkien (with Chinese grammatical function words

Then there is John Whitmore's piece about the Hokkien influence in the political and intellectual life of independent Dai Viet.

Li Qingxin has written about the origin of the Mac family in the Lei-chou peninsula, also a Hoklo area. This one is only in Chinese.

Then finally...there is a piece by Michael Churchman (some of you know who he is) about how Chinese and Vietnamese are modern concepts that do not fit into a discussion of the Han-T'ang period. I won't go into detail here, but I think you might enjoy this.
niuc
Posts: 734
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 3:23 pm
Location: Singapore

Re: Hoklo on Bali, reports from the field

Post by niuc »

Thank you, Ah-bin, for this!
amhoanna wrote:In Manila or Sugbo (Cebu) I saw a jeepney with this tagline: "PRIDE OF THE MALAY RACE".
Amhoanna, my Filipino friends indeed think of themselves as part of Malay race. They were taught in schools that their ancestors were from Borneo.
amhoanna wrote:It's interesting that no matter which definition of "Malay" we use, Luzon's agta and the orang asli of the "Malay Peninsula" fall beyond it.
Because they are Negritos? Did they reach SEAsia before the ancestors of other East Asians?
Ah-bin wrote:I think it is good to treat people's beliefs about their ethnicity with as much respect as we do their religious beliefs, even if we happen to think they are nonsense.
amhoanna wrote:Treating "ethnicity beliefs" like religious beliefs and respecting them is probably the best strategy for getting along with people, no doubt.
So true, especially for Ah-bin's example about Nong & Zhuang. No government should force an identity upon any group of people. Regarding some Taiwanese that are anti-Chinese (in cultural sense, not PRC, ROC or any political identity), it is different. Don't they still think of themselves as Hoklo or Hakka? If so, then they cannot deny that they are Chinese, since Hoklo & Hakka are Chinese. If they identify themselves as Alisan-lang that are sinicized, or if the term Hoklo is given a narrower meaning to disconnect it from Hokkien/Minnan and those Hakka Taiwanese who are anti-Chinese (if any) find another term to describe themselves, then I guess nobody could object to their self-identification.

It's interesting that though similar, "ethnicity beliefs" and religious beliefs usually move toward opposite directions, i.e. in claiming separatist identity for the former and established identity for the latter (e.g. Mormons/JWs claim to be Christians while most Christians view them as heretics; Yiguandao in Indonesia claim to be Buddhists, etc).
Ah-bin
Posts: 830
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 8:10 am
Location: Somewhere in the Hokloverse

Re: Hoklo on Bali, reports from the field

Post by Ah-bin »

it is different. Don't they still think of themselves as Hoklo or Hakka? If so, then they cannot deny that they are Chinese, since Hoklo & Hakka are Chinese.
You're still making a decision for them when you write that, and some people may still not want to be included in any variation of Chineseness, and still have their own reasons for doing it. I don't know any people like that myself, but I'm sure they do exist, and that they do have their reasons for existing. In any case, I'm sure most of the Taiwanese who say they aren't Chinese are merely saying that they are not Tiong-kok-lâng and not denying their Tng-lâng-ness or 華人-ness and that the issue is more of English confusing membership of political and other entities.

There are plenty of people whose ancestors came from what is now China in western countries who want nothing to do with it. I don't see any problem with it. One's culture and interests need not always be determined by our genetic ancestry I think. One day the balance of power might be different and the descendants of English people might not care about learning English. I wouldn't blame them for that either.

As a digression, one of the interesting things I learnt last year was that the Ch'ing government did not consider Chinese who had converted to Christianity as Chinese any more, so they were permitted to stay in Macau overnight, when the other Chinese were not.
It's interesting that though similar, "ethnicity beliefs" and religious beliefs usually move toward opposite directions, i.e. in claiming separatist identity for the former and established identity for the latter (e.g. Mormons/JWs claim to be Christians while most Christians view them as heretics; Yiguandao in Indonesia claim to be Buddhists, etc).
As far as I know I-kuan-tao will sneakily pretend to be just about anything (Taoist, Confucianist, Catholic) to get converts. I had a run in with them in the late 1990's when they were trying to rope people in through language exchanges and nice vegetarian food. I found out what they were called from someone else, and when I asked them "what is your religion called they said "It doesn't have a name , it's just the truth." If they had said "Well, some people call us I-kuan-tao but we think...." then I would have accepted it, but since they chose to lie about it, I decided their moral teachings were a bit weak and it probably wasn't worth having anything to do with them any more. Plus they used to get all fussy about eating sour cream and chives potato chips, try to indoctrinate me in the evils of garlic, and you should have seen the look on the man's face (he usually had a sort of dreamy, smiley look) when he saw that I had brought back from Taiwan one of those electrified badminton racket-type things that kill mosquitoes! I also happened to notice from a schedule hanging on the wall what time they got up in the morning and how many hours a day they spent praying. I decided to make a break for it then! :lol:

(just edited this to apologise for the blunt tone, I think it was the shortness of the sentences that does it. I've been on night shift and had no sleep, and I can see how it has affected my writing by making me unable to string long complex sentences together!)
Locked